优蜜传媒

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- In the U.S., Gallup's Economic Confidence Index averaged -3 for the week ending April 19. This is , and consistent with the past five weeks. And, although it is down from where it was in early 2015, the index remains higher than scores throughout most of 2014 and the preceding years stretching back to the start of the recession.

In late 2014, the index increased to positive territory for the first time since daily polling began in 2008. This across the U.S. In late February, as gas prices began increasing, the index dipped slightly and fell back into negative territory, for the week ending Feb. 22. Aside from increasing to , the index has remained between -2 and -4 since the end of February.

Gallup's Economic Confidence Index is the average of two components: how Americans rate the current economy and whether they think the economy is getting better or getting worse. Both of these sub-components were essentially unchanged from the previous week.

For the week ending April 19, 26% of Americans said the economy is "excellent" or "good," while 27% said it is "poor." This resulted in a current conditions score of -1, compared with 0 the week prior (based on 27% who rated the economy excellent or good, and 27% who rated the economy poor in the week ending April 12).

Since early March, at about the time gas prices stopped declining, Americans' economic outlook scores have been worse than their ratings of current economic conditions. Currently, 45% of Americans say the economy is "getting better" while 50% say it is "getting worse," resulting in an economic outlook score of -5, the same as the two weeks prior.

The index has been quite stable in recent weeks. From a longer-term perspective, it remains on the upper range of what .

The data in this article are available in .

Survey Methods

Results for this 优蜜传媒poll are based on telephone interviews conducted April 13-19, 2015, on the 优蜜传媒U.S. Daily survey, with a random sample of 3,553 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±2 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting.

Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 50% cellphone respondents and 50% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by time zone within region. Landline and cellular telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods.

Learn more about how works.